<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buy to let not included in mortgage support scheme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buytoletmortgages4u.co.uk/buy-to-let-mortgages/buy-to-let-not-included-in-mortgage-support-scheme/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buytoletmortgages4u.co.uk/buy-to-let-mortgages/buy-to-let-not-included-in-mortgage-support-scheme</link>
	<description>Buy To Let Mortgages 4 U finds you the best mortgage deal</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.buytoletmortgages4u.co.uk/buy-to-let-mortgages/buy-to-let-not-included-in-mortgage-support-scheme#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buytoletmortgages4u.co.uk/?p=110#comment-149</guid>
		<description>Why weren't buy-to-let mortgages included? I guess it might prove too much of a liability, and these are not primary residences by definition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why weren&#8217;t buy-to-let mortgages included? I guess it might prove too much of a liability, and these are not primary residences by definition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
