<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buy to let sector suffers fewer repossessions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buytoletmortgages4u.co.uk/buy-to-let-mortgages/buy-to-let-sector-suffers-less-repossessions/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buytoletmortgages4u.co.uk/buy-to-let-mortgages/buy-to-let-sector-suffers-less-repossessions</link>
	<description>Buy To Let Mortgages 4 U finds you the best mortgage deal</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 05:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: KC</title>
		<link>http://www.buytoletmortgages4u.co.uk/buy-to-let-mortgages/buy-to-let-sector-suffers-less-repossessions#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>KC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buytoletmortgages4u.co.uk/?p=92#comment-101</guid>
		<description>I assume that's 0.08%? 
I don't see why landlords should necessarily suffer - if there are more mainstream repossessions, then they'll need somewhere to live, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume that&#8217;s 0.08%?<br />
I don&#8217;t see why landlords should necessarily suffer - if there are more mainstream repossessions, then they&#8217;ll need somewhere to live, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
